Council forced to cancel licensing scheme debate after legal challenge

A legal challenge against a blanket licensing scheme has been mounted by a landlord.

The scheme has become a political hot potato in Enfield, north London.

Constantinos Regas has now applied for a judicial review of Labour-run Enfield Council’s decision to launch a mandatory licensing scheme covering every rented property in the borough.

His action was enough to cancel a debate scheduled to take place at a full council meeting last Wednesday night, to discuss a paper put forward by Tory councillors opposing the scheme.

Under the council’s scheme, every landlord will need to get a £500 licence lasting five years for each property.

Enfield argues that licensing is required to cut anti-social behaviour, tackle rogue landlords, raise standards and reduce overcrowding.

The scheme was given final approval by the council’s overview and scrutiny committee where a group of landlords made their protests after a petition signed by nearly 2,000 people.

Conservative opposition leader Cllr Terry Neville, who is against the scheme, said he was disappointed no debate took place last week.

He said: “Although I understand the legal reasons given by the council’s lawyers for postponing this debate, I do not agree that they are right.

“[We believe] that the decision to create a landlord licensing scheme was unnecessary due to existing and new measures being put into place by the Conservative-led government to tackle the small minority of rogue landlords.

“The standard of private rented homes is a very big issue as the number of rented properties has increased in recent years in our borough, and it is our belief that the new measures being introduced by the Government, together with the diligent application of the existing law by the council against the minority of bad landlords, would be more effective in tackling the problem.

“I am keen therefore to debate this matter in the near future.”

The opposition agreed to adjourn the debate until a decision has been made on the challenge for a judicial review.

A council spokesman said: “Enfield Council approved the additional selective licensing scheme on April 9. This decision was affirmed on April 30 by the overview and scrutiny committee.

“The scheme has been introduced to reduce anti-social behaviour in the borough.

“The opposition priority paper titled ‘Tackling abuse in the private rented sector’ was submitted by the Opposition for July’s full council meeting before the judicial review claim was issued.

“Following Enfield Council’s receipt of the judicial review claim, the opposition agreed at full council on July 16 to adjourn their paper until the judicial review is disposed of.

“Enfield Council is vigorously defending the judicial review. It would be prejudicial to disclose the details of the council’s defence at this stage.”

It is understood that Mr Regas is seeking to challenge the council’s evidence base behind its decision, the legitimacy of the consultation process, and whether the terms and conditions of the licences are reasonable.

x

Email the story to a friend

9 Comments

  1. MF

    Very much look forward to the outcome of this. Good luck Mr Regas!

    Report
  2. ray comer

    Its good to see these schemes being challenged; the councils already have the powers to deal with these issues, they don't need to fleece every landlord for £500 in order to reinforce them.

    Report
    1. MF

      Quite right, Ray. By the way, £500 is pretty cheap compared to what my local councils charge – circa £1000 per application! Given that the fees are strictly not allowed to be "profit making", god knows how or why one council is half the price of another. "Scam" is the only word coming to mind…

      Report
  3. Elbee

    How much anti-social behaviour comes from the PRS and how much comes from social housing? Responsible private landlords will act when their tenants cause problems. Irresponsible private landlords won't, nor will they register for a licence until forced.

    Report
  4. Woodentop

    Anti-social behaviour is the TENANT not the Landlord, am I missing something here. Shouldn't the tenant be licenced to rent!!!!!! Nearly 100% of our business grief is from tenants not Landlords.

    Report
    1. smile please

      Spot on! and we must also remember that the rouge landlords only make up a small percentage of the market. I feel sometimes that tenants expect a brand new kitchen and bathroom every three years and for them to take no responsibility in looking after the home.

      Report
    2. PeeBee

      Slightly (okay – COMPLETELY…) off-subject – but are you THE "Woodentop" from days of old over on 'that other' news website?

      Report
      1. Woodentop

        Hello PeeBee, wondered how long it would take you to spot me. Being off radar gave me a break from some of those frustrating, idiotic non-agents posts on that other site and no I still have no love for RM and all my predictions have all come true …. so far, except euromillions, lol.

        Report
  5. Woodentop

    Just one other point on this subject … the housing bill specifically states that any discretionary rules implemented by a local authority cannot take place without first public consultation. I believe this was to prevent councils just doing as they please, but very little if any evidence that they are. I challenged my local authority on this point who couldn't come up with a public consulation …. "I'm sure we must have" was quoted and she went away very red faced and hasn't popped her head up out of the trenches since.

    Report
X

You must be logged in to report this comment!

Leave a Reply

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.