Home Information Packs to be brought back under Housing and Planning Bill

In a late amendment to the Housing and Planning Bill, Home Information Packs are set to be brought back.

The amendment, one of no fewer than 2,572 to the Bill, has not only been tabled by a Tory – the party that got rid of them in 2010 – but by the housing minister himself, Brandon Lewis.

The move is understood to have the strong support of George Osborne, who believes the VAT receipts from HIPS – which will be given a different name – could be substantial.

The amendment has been drawn up ahead of a government inquiry looking at abortive house sales.

The amendment would be implemented, by a commencement order, if the review found evidence that HIPs had in fact cut fall-through rates.

Astonishingly, there has never been any study as to whether this was the case or not.

It has also emerged that the Association of Home Information Pack Providers has never been formally disbanded.

Secretary General Mike Ockenden said: “We have spent the past six years persistently lobbying behind the scenes and are ready to spring fully back into action at a moment’s notice.”

AHIPP – and Westminster – have been impressed by the success of the Scottish version of HIPs, Home Reports.

Home Reports contain a survey, a valuation, an EPC, plus a questionnaire that the seller has to complete.

The new HIPs would have all these documents, but also have to contain:

  • A professionally produced health and safety assessment of the property, together with a rating of, for example, stairs, gardens and cookers. Homes must score a minimum of five out of ten or be banned from the market. The score would have to be “prominently” shown in all advertising, including listings on all the portals.
  • A ‘child safety’ assessment – three and four-bedroom homes on roads, close to rivers or within half a mile of any beach, for example, could not be advertised as family homes and could only be sold to adult-only households.
  • A ‘pet suitability’ assessment, similar to the child safety one. A property which failed its pet suitability assessment could not be sold to anyone with a cat, dog or even a hamster. Tortoises would be exempt.
  • A sustainability rating, based on the local wildlife population such as Dartford warblers and whether residents can walk or cycle to work and shops. Homes with low sustainability ratings, such as properties in the countryside not on a bus route, would be banned from the market.
  • Checks on the immigration status of all potential buyers and those in their households.
  • HIPS would be extended to extensions.

The amendment proposes civil sanctions for householders who breach requirements, and automatic criminal sanctions for agents, including up to ten years in jail.

No sanctions will be applied to online agents, which will be exempt from having to produce HIPs as the Government is making it clear that it wishes to encourage competition.

Online agent Russell Flairpool said: “This means we will be able to save sellers at least £20,000 on average. It’s great news. The days of high street agents and their rip-off fees are numbered.”

Solicitor Jeremy Jarndyce, of Parchment Street, Winchester, said: “We welcome any move that will help the legal profession speed up our work on transactions.”

There is likely to be a substantial body of opposition, although not SPLINTA which previously led the battle.

Although it has yet to trade, SPLINTA last month become a proptech company, currently involved in a round of crowdfunding to raise £10m against a valuation of £450m.

The commencement order for the re-introduction of HIPs is pencilled in for next April 1.

Labour has said it will fight it tooth and nail.

x

Email the story to a friend



16 Comments

  1. IHS

    George Osborne is desperate for money so don’t give him ideas!!!

    Report
  2. smile please

    Please please God no!

    The best thing Torys did was get rid of them.

    There is a shortage of property for sale at the moment bringing back HIPS will mean many others will not come to market as they do not want the burden of upfront costs.

    And let’s face it, they are as useful as a chocolate teapot!

    Report
    1. smile please

      Hang on, just checked the date! Well done!

      Report
  3. AdamWalker98

    You had me until pets 😉

    Report
  4. Typhoon

    “Please” tell me Property Eye this is your April fool article!!!!

    It’s a world gone totally mad. Clearly the intention is to raise money for the Chancellor, nothing to do with protecting consumers.
    No sanctions will be applied to online agents, which will be exempt from having to produce HIPs as the Government is making it clear that it wishes to encourage competition.”
    Why in God’s name would such legislation exempt on line agents  when already the evidence is out there of the shocking service they are providing the consumer with dozens of people being led to the market by them and being lost because there is no support.

     

    The  government would be better employed to legislate what it takes to be a proper estate agent to ensure the public can be supported and given correct information and advice,which is what the majority of estate agents provide as a matter of course.

     

    But  that apart, what the governent still don’t understand it is the fickle, selfish actions of both buyers and sellers who,are infinitely more responsible for sales falling through if they have a change of heart. The estate agency industry gets the rap, and the twisted public hide behind that,smiling that they got away with it.

     

     

     

    Report
  5. Ric

    If only this was actually true!!! Seriously, they were not so bad!

    We produced our own, and simply sourced out the Local Search and Con29 Water Search stitched them together in a nice binder and hey presto cheap HIPS but they didn’t half stop the time wasters coming to the market and sales did without question start that bit quicker. Especially unregistered titles where I hate to say you don’t worry about it now until the solicitor brings it up and mass panic sets in.

    Give em ideas I say, as I would love to see the “onlineOnlyCallCentreAgents” cope with getting HIPS out, fast and affordable and still mess around with cheap fees.

     

    Report
  6. pierce

    Maybe the SDLT was a joke as well and we have all been busting a gut to get over the oline for nothing 🙂

    ** Clicks Fingers ** You’re awake!

    Report
  7. Will

    Very good.  It started off sounding plausible as we all KNOW   George Osbourne is a fool!

    Report
  8. PeeBee

    SOOO much better thought out; prepared and presented than the tatty effort down the other pub.

    But, then – that’s exactly what we would and can expect from EYE… ;o)

    Report
  9. PeeBee

    ALL extensions should have HIPs.

    Flat roofs are a pain in the chuff…

    Report
  10. LandlordsandLetting

    Not only is the government intervening to bring back HIPs and actually forcing people to obtain Pet Suitability Certificates, but take a look at these future proposals to attack residential landlords:

    http://www.landlordsandletting.co.uk/Blog/government-plans-for-future-buy-to-let-landlord-laws/

    Report
  11. cybelex

    Ha, ha! I very nearly fell for this one 🙂

    Report
  12. grumpyoldman83

    Time the editor ran for parliament and taught her new colleagues how to wind us up even more than they do now

    Report
  13. Property Paddy

    I heard they’re bringing out Social Housing Information Tables or known as S.H.I.T.S. but then they said this was a cr4py idea !

    Report
  14. agentx

    ha ha – Got me up to the exemption for online ONLY agents. Very good 🙂

    Report
  15. NewsBoy

    Check the dates boys and girls!

    Report
X

You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.