Latest clampdown on landlords to cut buy-to-let lending by up to 20%

Lending to buy-to-let borrowers is to be tightened up, with ‘stress’ levels raised.

Lenders will have to assess borrowers on the assumption that they will be able to cover their interest payments on the basis of borrower rates being 5.5% for five years.

The Bank of England’s Prudential Regulation Authority says that this should reduce buy-to-let approvals by between 10% and 20% by 2019.

The PRA says constraints are needed to ensure underwriting standards do not slip, with lenders currently expecting a 20% increase in buy-to-let business over the next two or three years.

Lending rules for larger landlords look set to be toughened up further. The PRA is seeking to establish a standard definition of what constitutes a ‘portfolio landlord’, suggesting that this would be someone with four or more mortgaged rental properties.

The PRA says there is an increase in arrears among landlords with buy-to-let portfolios of four or more mortgaged properties.

The PRA wants lending to portfolio landlords to follow a specialist underwriting process that accounts for the complex nature of the borrower and their portfolio of properties.

A consultation has been launched on the proposals, running until June 29.

However, the Residential Landlords Association was swift to attack the latest clampdown as premature.

While agreeing that no landlord should take on debt that they cannot afford, the RLA said that the proposals are premature given the considerable tax changes being made to the sector which are likely to cool the market.

David Smith, the RLA’s policy director, said: “The Bank needs to be careful that it does not over-react to the current surge in buy-to-let applications which are aiming to beat the tax increases coming shortly.

“These include a 3% extra levy on Stamp Duty and abolition of mortgage interest relief. It is likely that the impact of these will significantly reduce the demand for borrowing.

“We would urge the Bank to tread carefully and avoid any premature moves that could stifle the supply of the 1 million rental properties the country desperately needs.”


Email the story to a friend

One Comment

  1. Property Paddy

    perhaps if ossie & co invested in areas which need it rather than trying to skew the property market with BTL clampdowns we wouldn’t be in this mess.

    For example Mr Osborne are you aware of the steel industry in Port Talbot ?

    Probably not !


You must be logged in to report this comment!

Leave a Reply