Traditional v. online: Almost one in five high street agents now playing ‘both games at once’

More agents now consider themselves to be operating as hybrids. The 18% proportion compares with 11% two years ago, while almost one in five of high street agents are playing ‘both games at once’.

The findings are among the first to emerge from the preliminary results of the latest survey tracking the competitive landscape between high street and online agents.

Our readers were asked last week to help independent researcher Mark Notari with a follow-up survey to the first one he did (as a thesis for a Masters degree) 20 months ago.

Answers to the second survey closed on Monday at 5pm, and Notari has wasted no time in collating the results.

They have not, however, been analysed, and in particular, the results have not been compared with the findings of the first survey. Notari expects his analysis to take about a fortnight, and we will let you have these further results when we can.

Meanwhile, we can tell you that EYE readers completed 183 surveys – and we would like to thank you for your interest and time.

A total of 125 responses, all from independent high street agents, form the basis of this latest hot-off-the-press research.

The preliminary bullet points are:

  • The majority of the sample (38%) think that online agents account for 5% of listings published on the portals; the next highest proportion of 12% think online agents have 10% market share.
  • Most agents (47%) expect online market share to increase over the next year, but opinion is sharply divided, with 46% thinking online market share will stay the same. Only 7% expect online market share to decrease over the next year.
  • It is an entirely different story when asked if online market share will increase over the next five years: 56% of high street agents think it will go up, but equal numbers (22%) believe it will stay the same or go down.
  • Most agents (81%) believe high street agents will continue to dominate the industry; 17% believe high street and online agents will have equal share; just 3% believe high street agents will become minor players.
  • High street attitudes towards competition are revealing: most think the most important competition is other independent agents (59% strongly agreed with this statement); corporate agents are rated as the next most important competitors, by 32%; only 22% believe online agents are the most important competitors.
  • Most high street agents (35%) are seen as talking about the online competition but not doing anything about it; 27% of high street agents are seen as taking appropriate steps; 5% are ignoring online competition. And while 19% of high street agents are judged to be proactive, 14% are seen as “making too much noise” about it.
  • Asked about their own responses, estate agents are unequivocal: 78% plan to stay focused on their own business; 4% are ignoring online agents; and 18% are playing both games at once.
  • Loyalty to the high street is enormous – but commitment to the ‘no sale, no fee model’ rather less so. Almost all the agents in the survey (97%) have no intention of shifting their business to be entirely online; however, 52% are considering moving to fixed agency fees – one of the defining characteristics of online firms.
  • Asked what sets high street independents above the online competition, the winner is better local market knowledge (82% of agents rate this as their top characteristic), followed by the ability to build stronger relationships with local buyers (71%); in comparison, 61% believe their ability to achieve higher selling prices is their own best point of differential.
  • When it comes to their weaknesses in comparison with online agents, the high street cites its worst weaknesses as charging higher fees (54%) and having higher overheads (48%).
  • Asked why they have not yet switched to an online business model, most of the agents said they did not think it is viable.
  • Agents thought the biggest risks were compromising the quality of the service offered (54% strongly agreed with this statement); undermining the firm’s reputation (44% strongly agreed with this); and cannibalising the existing business model (32% strongly agreed with this).
x

Email the story to a friend



11 Comments

  1. Simon Bradbury

    Interesting stuff.

    I’m still surprised at just how low the actual or perceived market share of so called ‘online’ estate agents actually is – particularly when compared to the projections of a few years ago.

    Of course this doesn’t mean that their market share will not increase , but the pace of increase is surprisingly low.

    What’s the honest guess of percentage market share for ‘online estate agents in 5 years?

    My guess is 10%

    Report
    1. r29woolf

      I hate the term “online” agents. We’re all online aren’t we? I’m yet to come across a high street agent that doesn’t have a website. Most advertise on Rightmove and Zoopla/OTM. I suspect an overwhelming majority now use at least one Social Media platform. For me, referring to them as “online” gives them some sort of credence that they are better digitally than high street.  I also think it does a massive disservice to hybrid agencies who may not have a high street offering but most certainly are full service agents. How about we use the terms “Call Centre Agents” and ” Full Service Agents” as a differentiator so the public can better understand the difference?

      Report
      1. Simon Bradbury

        Totally agree with your point about describing this sector as “online” – implying that some agents are not.That’s why I described it as… so called ‘online’.

        In fact aren’t most of us actually ‘hybrid’? Combining digital/online strategies with traditional personal services.

        I’ve yet to discover a satisfactory definition of an ‘online estate agent’.

        Thoughts anyone?

        Report
    2. AgentVX17

      It’s already 10% ….By 2020 It will be 50-50. 🙂

      Report
  2. AgentV

    Does anyone else still find the terminology conflicting? How many times have we all said, as independents, we are all Agents and we are alll online.

    I think a better diffferentiation would be ‘online listers’ and ‘full service agents’.

    Report
    1. r29woolf

      Said a lot more succinctly than my rant Agent V. Agree wholeheartedly. 

      Report
    2. PropGuy

      I think a better diffferentiation would be ‘online listers’ and ‘full service agents’.

      The lines are blurred much more than that though.

      Online listers look like online listers, act like online listers and behave like online listers because they are online listers. Simple.

      But there are plenty of ‘full service agents’ in my area who look like full service agents, will scream from the rooftops that they are full service agents but act like online listers, behave like online listers and moan about online listers for reducing fees!

      Report
  3. SJEA

    As agreed with many of the responses, I have not met a competitor that does not have a website.

    I think the most suitable reference is ‘call centre agents’ for the non-traditional agent. This is the most descriptive and certainly sums up the experience of most consumers of their service and who likes calling a call centre ?

    Although we have higher over-heads – a good office location provides regular and constant advertising of your brand and also gives some ‘assurances’ to would-be customers if you have been around for a few years !

    Report
    1. AgentV

      Yes agreed, but can we also take the agent out of it, as in many many people’s eyes they do not act as a proper agent;

      ‘Call Centre Listers’

      Report
      1. AgentV

        Call Centre Listing Owner Terminal System 
        or
        Call Centre Listing Owner Telemarketing System 
        (CCLOTS)

        Report
  4. Property Pundit

    I’ve got another way of distinguishing between the two types. Imagine an agent with a pretty packed diary where there is only one time slot left. They can either do a viewing (that might lead to a sale) or a valuation (that could lead to an up-front payment).

    Report
X

You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.